Reddit canon fd lenses It’s cheap for a full frame camera (so the field-of-view will be what you’re expecting from the FD lenses), it’s small while still having a decent grip, and if you get it with a kit lens or buy a native lens or two the autofocus will be decently good, too (not the best, though). Some lenses are noteworthy for their performance, build […] Welcome to reddit's home for discussion of the Canon EF, EF-S, EF-M, and RF Mount interchangeable lens DSLR and Mirrorless cameras, and occasionally their point-and-shoot cousins. [S] [USA-CA] Vintage lenses, Canon FD 200mm f4, Canon FD 50mm Macro f3. 4, so I'm going to get more FD lenses so I only need one adapter. I already have a canon FD 50mm f1. 8, and 135mm f/2. 5-4. This can happen to a mint condition one too as it can develop with more use. https://en. I even made one to use a large projector lens on my canon body (it “worked” but not well, I blame the adapter designer!) and it had no issues Eith the weight. I want a 135mm and a wide angle, like a prime around 20-30mm. Today, we’ll talk about a more standard focal length, a focal length that many consider to be the standard, in fact. It’s the 50mm ƒ/1. Below is a link to more info about the Canon FD lens mount, along with a comprehensive list of all FD lenses, sorted by focal length. 8 or even the 35mm f/3. Yeah FD lenses are amazing. Modern lenses will be sharper than a Canon FD lens. Tamron Adaptall 2 SP 90mm f/2. You've got a good wide and standard lens, I'd get the 100mm 2. 0 is highly regarded but very expensive these days. A larger sensor has more dynamic range, lower noise at high ISO, shallower depth of field for nice bokeh. When I hunt used lenses, I'm looking for something cheap. The adapters with glass cause flares and you loss at least one stop in aperture. 4, 28mm f/2. and a 50/1. Simmod lenses offers mounts that convert the FD to EF. Larger aperture versions are MUCH more expensive. I know the difference in image quality is pretty large due to the optical glass required for the adapter, but I was wondering if anyone has any stills/footage comparing a converted FD lens to an unmodded FD lens with an FD to EF adapter on it (or something along the lines of that, like comparing the FD on a camera with an FD mount vs EF camera with EF adapter) to quantify the difference visually. The Canon FD 35mm f2 is consider to be one of the best wide angle lenses for FD. I also had older canon FL50MM 1. It's sharp and has excellent image quality, decently wide aperture, small, light, has very nice handling on any body, has IS, and very quick to focus. 8 and 35mm 2. You're going to be paying a premium for most FD lenses. 2 L series adapted to my mirroelss camera. Same goes for Rokkors, or old Zeiss Jenas. I picked up three Sears brand lenses made for Canon FD mount with Dorito coatings for about eight bucks from a thrift store. FD lenses aren’t any more prone to problems than any other brand. I’m not sticking my big L lenses on one though. IMO. I'm getting a sony a7ii to take photos with vintage lenses. But it wasnt of such quality as nFD lenses in terms of sharpness, coatings, abberations. They're also not as expensive as the L lenses. Basic kit should be wide, standard, telephoto. We also sometime talk about other canon equipment such as printers. . The 35 2. I LOVE that lens so much. In general, FD lenses are well-regarded for having excellent image quality, but if you're looking for some "uniqueness", as in imperfections and such, look into the earlier FD lenses. These Adaptall lenses are readily available for good prices, and you can get the Adaptall-2 mounts for basically any camera system you can think of for $10-25. You can exchange the FD mount with a PL mount for example. Or Pentax as well. wikipedia. 4 specifically, there aren’t any independent brands to choose from anyway. 5 which is also very sharp, create wonderful background separation and very cheap. 4 is not going to be a bad choice. The 50 and 85 can be used forever almost (in my book anything below 50mm is just speciality again). 8 (FD mount compatible) on my apsc sony nex 3n camera, I very much liked the character it gave me. The chrome-nose 35mm f/2 is also spectacularly sharp. 5 in my collection. 8-3. Canon FD lenses are becoming quite popular. The Canon FD 28mm 2. I was actually quite surprised with both the build quality as well as it’s performance on my Sony A7SII mirrorless. Depends on what you plan on shooting, as long as the lenses are FD lenses you’re good to go. They are all breech-lock style. But, as you already know, sharpness isn't everything. But the FD lenses can actually be used for any stage of professionality, except when commercial cleanliness is required. K-35 lenses are not just a rehoused Canon FD lens by Canon during the 1980s with cinema gears made for PL mount cameras? Canon FD glass if given the right adaptation can give nice results. you already own some great glass, i would recommend the 300mm and a 20mm 2. I personally have a few, very decent Canon FD lenses (50mm f/1. The earlier breech lock ones are famously radioactive with their internal yellow, amber hue element but the later new FD versions aren't radioactive. Hey guys, I recently got to test out the Canon FD 50mm F1. You will need an adapter that fits the lens mount and attaches to his Sony mount. 8 are my favorites for everyday shooting, both old and new versions work well. If you’re looking for an FD mount 50mm 1. org/wiki/Canon_FD_lens_mount FWIW, I own a Canon A-1 and I have and really enjoy the following breech-lock style FD lenses: 35-105mm f3. Welcome to reddit's home for discussion of the Canon EF, EF-S, EF-M, and RF Mount interchangeable lens DSLR and Mirrorless cameras, and occasionally their point-and-shoot cousins. FWIW I have mount adapters for Nikon F, Minolta SR, Canon FD, and M42 mount that let me use these Adaptall lenses on nearly all my 35mm cameras. It's going to be a great street lens, and any lens is a good landscape lens. I have had some good results with a Lumix mirrorless Micro 4/3 and canon FD lenses (glassless adapter), This has live view and a focus assist feature. FD lenses aresome of the most sought after. Older lenses have character. FD lenses are indeed a little "unfriendly" with most DSLRs. If you had a cheap Fotodiox adapter it wouldn't give such a result, but given t I’ve made a couple adapters, both PLA and ABS and they’re plenty strong for most consumer lenses. Like any line, Canon made some beauties and made some garbage. 5). 5 is a great lens. My budget for these two lenses is $100 total, but preferably less so I can get more lenses. Shouldn't be a problem, but it'll be stopped down metering only. 5 + extension tube FD25, Fujinon 55mm f1. For the wide end, look into the 24mm f/2. All questions and photographic experience levels welcome! Check out the Canon RP. 5. Colours had serious retro look sometimes with cool fringing. Another good option for portraits is the 135mm f/2. 8, 28mm f/2. 5 or the f3. I have a rehoused Canon FD glass that is a 35-105mm F/3. 8 M42, Tokina 35-200 PK upvotes · comments r/IsItBullshit Dec 21, 2014 · In previous weeks we’ve talked about some noteworthy lenses, including a Minolta fish-eye and a Nikkor ultra-wide. 8 FD (and FDn) lens from Canon. Hey guys, bought a Canon FD - L mount adapter as I fancy using some old Canon lenses with my fp. The lens mileage will vary depending whether it was repaired long time ago by Canon when FD lens spare parts still existed or a diy repair job. That would be Canon FD to Sony E, for that lens. 8 or 35mm f/2. Picked it up for $50 and really wasn’t expecting much for the money. The manual FD lenses are popular for the mirrorless crowd for Stop Motion Animation, Time lapse, flora, and some street photography operating wide open. I have a couple different Adaptall lenses and I have the mount adapters for Nikon F, Canon FD, Minolta SR, and M42. It's my main lens with my Canon F-1. BUT, FD lenses were designed for a shorter focal flange distance, so the rear glass elements will definitely collide with an EF Focal Reducer and may collide with the internal walls of a camera's mount. Has anybody adapted FD lenses to the R system? If so, what adapter and what lenses do you recommend to get? I'd also like to know your thoughts on general use and the look of these vintage lenses. 8 (01A) I've been fortunate to use A LOT of Canon lenses over the last 16 years, including many L's, and if I had to pick one lens, I'd take the Canon 35mm f/2 IS USM any day. It’s got a reputation for being the “most advanced 50mm lens” that existed for it’s time, mainly due to it’s aspherical design which was able to keep it’s size and weight WAY down for it’s aperture size. They perform wonderfully, especially given that they were not terribly expensive when I bought them. First, if sharpness was your main priority, you'd use a lens designed with modern computer-aided design. Usually the "Chrome Nose" versions have interesting qualities to them. The 35mm f2 and other lenses with floating elements develop this issue. I've had good experience with Urth. 5 Macro (52B) Tamron Adaptall 2 SP 35-80mm f/2. 8. Any recommendations for prime lenses (50mm and… Hey guys, been using the Canon FD 70-210mm F4 lens a lot recently. wqmqp yhi degelnk xjmj jsz nsxhr dyoaq tblsnum gslin hbavmcl tdxrmosm txhlr woxv mizmcvp hlvd